Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2005

In re Rostoker

In re Rostoker
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 24, 2005 · No. 991 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
582 Pa. 359; 871 A.2d 787; 2005 Pa. LEXIS 874
In re Rostoker

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2005, a Rule having been entered by this Court on January 31, 2005, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Michael David Rostoker to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Michael David Rostoker is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provi*360sions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.