Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006

In re Nomination Petition of Deyoung

In re Nomination Petition of Deyoung
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 25, 2006 · Baer, Baldwin, Cappy, Castille, Eakin, Newman, Saylor
895 A.2d 546 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

In re Nomination Petition of Deyoung

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2006, we REVERSE the Order of the Commonwealth Court and REMAND to the Commonwealth Court for a decision on the merits on Appellee Harry M. Riley’s Petition to Set Aside Nomination Petition. Said decision to be rendered within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. A qualified private party has a right to object to a Statement of Financial Interests attached to a Nomination Petition, therefore Appellee has standing to object in this matter. Cf. In re Nomination Petition Bryant, 578 Pa. 421, 852 A.2d 1193 (2004); In re Petition of Cioppa, 533 Pa. 564, 626 A.2d 146 (1993). Opinion to follow. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.