Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006

In re Cellino

In re Cellino
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 15, 2006 · Baldwin, Madame, Matter
897 A.2d 1161 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

In re Cellino

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2006, it appearing that Ross M. Cellino, Jr., a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth, has been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York for a period of six months by Order of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, entered June 10, 2005, and the said Ross M. Cellino, Jr., having stated that he has no objection to the imposition of reciprocal discipline in this Commonwealth in accordance with Rule 216, Pa. R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that Ross M. Cellino, Jr., is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of six months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Madame Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.