Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006

Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 29, 2006 · Baldwin, Consideration, Matter

586 Pa. 477; 895 A.2d 526; 2006 Pa. LEXIS 338

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of March 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The parties are directed to address the following issue:

*478Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s decision that a door closing mechanism on a train is a “part and appurtenance” within the meaning of the Locomotive Inspection Act (LIA) in determining strict liability for an injury sustained by a railroad employee?

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.