City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police
City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police
926 A.2d 437; 592 Pa. 454; 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1090
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of May 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, as to the following issue:
Whether the Commonwealth Court’s decision permitting the reduction of post-retirement healthcare benefits for active officers conflicts with the Supreme Court’s decision in Appeal of Upper Providence Township, 514 Pa. 501, 526 A.2d 315 (1987)?
In briefing this issue, the parties are directed to address whether the arbitrator’s award approving a capping of contributions for healthcare benefits for future retirees constitutes a diminishment in benefits in a present employee’s pension or retirement system.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.