MacDonald v. CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
MacDonald v. CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL, 929 A.2d 1162 (Pa. 2007)
593 Pa. 741
Per Curiam

MacDonald v. CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL

Opinion

ERIN S. MacDONALD, A MINOR, BY HER PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS, MARK F. MacDONALD AND RUTH F. MacDONALD, AND MARK F. MacDONALD AND RUTH F. MacDONALD, IN THEIR OWN RIGHT, Petitioners
v.
CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL; CHESTNUT HILL HEALTHCARE, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL; STEVEN GEWIRTZMAN, M.D.; JOHN MAGEE, M.D.; CHESTNUT HILL PEDIATRIC GROUP, P.C.; ROBERT NOCERINI, M.D.; CHESTNUT HILL EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES, LTD.; C. AUSTIN, M.D.; ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, IN ITS OWN RIGHT AND D/B/A THE CHOP CONNECTION AT ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA, IN ITS OWN RIGHT AND D/B/A THE CHOP CONNECTION AT ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Respondents.

No. 290 EAL 2006.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.

August 21, 2007.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

Reference

Status
Published