Neighbors Allied for Best Riverfront v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Neighbors Allied for Best Riverfront v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, 927 A.2d 199 (Pa. 2007)
592 Pa. 609; 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1314
Per Curiam
Neighbors Allied for Best Riverfront v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
Opinion
*610 ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2007, the Application for Summary Relief filed by HSP Gaming, LP, is granted. The Petition for Review filed by Petitioners is dismissed for lack of standing pursuant to Society Hill Civic Ass’n v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, — Pa. —, 928 A.2d 175, 2007 WL 1610165 (June 4, 2007). The Application to Lodge filed by Petitioners is denied.
Justice Castille and Saylor dissent. See Society Hill Civic Ass’n v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Bd., — Pa. —, —, 928 A.2d 175, 185-86, 2007 WL 1610165, *8-9 (June 4, 2007) (Saylor, J., dissenting).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- NEIGHBORS ALLIED FOR the BEST RIVERFRONT; Bella Vista United Civic Association; The Friends of Penn Treaty Park; Hilary Regan; Bruce Schimmel; Edward Verrall; Bromley Palamountain; Richard Wolk; John Dietel and Kathleen O’Neill, a Married Couple; For Themselves and Their Minor Child; And Louis Cook, Petitioners, v. the PENNSYLVANIA GAMING CONTROL BOARD, Respondent, HSP Gaming, LP, Intervenor, Philadelphia Entertainment and Development Partners, LP, Intervenor
- Status
- Published