Commonwealth v. Selenski
Commonwealth v. Selenski
937 A.2d 445; 594 Pa. 713
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Commonwealth v. SELENSKI (Pa. 2010)
- Commonwealth v. Mathis, D., Aplt. (Pa. 2017)
- OUM v. DOUGHERTY (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2021)
- Rockwell v. Knott (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas 2013)
- Com. v. Rhodes, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020)
- Bauta v. Greyhound Lines, Inc (District Court, E.D. New York 2020)
- Com. v. Santiago, W. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)
- Commonwealth v. Mathis (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent
v.
HUGO MARCUS SELENSKI, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
(1) Discuss whether the Superior Court was correct in concluding that "the Commonwealth exercised due diligence and that the circumstances occasioning the postponement were beyond the control of the Commonwealth" within the meaning of Pa.R.Crim.P. 600(G).
(2) Discuss whether the Superior Court applied the proper standard of review and the proper scope of review in reviewing the trial court's order granting Petitioner's motion to dismiss under Pa.R.Crim.P. 600.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.