Everhart v. PMA Insurance Group
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Everhart v. PMA Insurance Group, 927 A.2d 205 (Pa. 2007)
Everhart v. PMA Insurance Group
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of June 2007, the Petition for Leave to File an Addendum to the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The issues as stated by Petitioners are:
(1) Whether the lower court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment, where the decedent was a “class one” insured for the purpose of stacking underinsured motorist benefits under the policy of insurance issued in the name of the corporation.
(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in holding that underinsured motorist*206 benefits can not be stacked under a commercial fleet policy, which is inconsistent with and contrary to the [MVFRL] (75 Pa.C.S. § 1738).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert D. EVERHART and Christine J. Yost, Administrators of the Estate of Robert E. Everhart v. The PMA INSURANCE GROUP, A Pennsylvania Corporation, Meyer & Eckenrode Insurance Group, A Pennsylvania Business Entity, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, An Illinois Corporation, and Russell Standard Corp., A Pennsylvania Corporation
- Status
- Published