Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008

RITTENHOUSE PLAZA, INC. v. Lichtman

RITTENHOUSE PLAZA, INC. v. Lichtman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 5, 2008 · Per Curiam
959 A.2d 909; 598 Pa. 610; 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1984 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

RITTENHOUSE PLAZA, INC. v. Lichtman

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2008, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Review, and the “Emergency Motion to Amend Supersedeas,” which is treated as a Motion for Stay, are DENIED. Respondents’ Motion to Consolidate is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑