RITTENHOUSE PLAZA, INC. v. Lichtman
RITTENHOUSE PLAZA, INC. v. Lichtman
959 A.2d 909; 598 Pa. 610; 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1984
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Commonwealth v. Walker (Pa. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2008, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Review, and the “Emergency Motion to Amend Supersedeas,” which is treated as a Motion for Stay, are DENIED. Respondents’ Motion to Consolidate is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.