In re Nomination Petition of Farnese
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Nomination Petition of Farnese (Pa. 2011)
- In re Nomination Petition of Farnese (Pa. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2008, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby affirmed in part. The portion *465 of the order denying the Petition to Set Aside the Nomination Petition of Lawrence M. Farnese, Jr., is affirmed. This order is entered without prejudice to the Appellants to seek review of any future order of the Commonwealth Court which may impose a final order of costs. See In re Nomination Paper of Nader, 588 Pa. 450, 461-62, 905 A.2d 450, 457 (2006). We further direct that the Commonwealth Court’s final order assessing costs, if any, shall reference such costs by category and amount assessed and shall include a statement of rationale for the imposition of such costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.