Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc.
Bugosh v. I.U. North America, Inc.
942 A.2d 897; 596 Pa. 265; 2008 Pa. LEXIS 111
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive, Corp. (District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania 2012)
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt. (Pa. 2014)
- Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009)
- Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009)
- Durkot v. Tesco Equipment, LLC (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2009)
- Berrier v. Simplicity Manufacturing, Inc. (Pa. 2008)
- David Covell v. Bell Sports Inc (3d Cir. 2011)
- Hoffman v. Paper Converting Machine Co. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2010)
- Berrier v. Simplicity Manufacturing, Inc. (3d Cir. 2009)
- Gaudio v. Ford Motor Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009)
- Richetta v. Stanley Fastening Systems, L.P. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2009)
- David Covell v. Bell Sports Inc (3d Cir. 2011)
- Berrier v. Simplicity Mfg Inc (3d Cir. 2009)
- Borough of Youngwood v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board (Pa. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether this Court should apply § 2 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts in place of § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.