Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008

Cruz v. PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY

Cruz v. PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 29, 2008 · No. 364-365 EAL 2007 · Todd
950 A.2d 269 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cruz v. PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court’s decision is REVERSED in part to the extent it holds that there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the use of the process was primarily used for a purpose for which it was not designed. See Wimer v. Pa. Emp. Benefit Trust Fund, 595 Pa. 627, 939 A.2d 843 (2007); see also *270 McNeil v. Jordan, 586 Pa. 413, 894 A.2d 1260 (2006). Further, this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration of the harm element of McNeil, 894 A.2d at 1275.

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.