Fortune v. LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT
Fortune v. LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT
948 A.2d 805; 597 Pa. 707
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Fortune v. LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT
Opinion
CERISSA R. FORTUNE, Respondent
v.
LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM J. MANCINO, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND AS DIRECTOR OF THE LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT; AMY STROBEL, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND AS OFFICE MANAGER OF THE LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT; AND CRYSTAL SCHILLING, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE LAWRENCE COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT, Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of April 2008, the Motion for Leave to File Reply to Brief in Opposition is denied. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.