Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009

Murphy v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA

Murphy v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided September 22, 2009 · Per Curiam
981 A.2d 1285; 603 Pa. 69; 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2025 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Murphy v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid *70 representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record. See CP-51-CR-0013668-2008.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.