Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009

Mohamed v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor Vehicles

Mohamed v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor Vehicles
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 16, 2009 · Per Curiam
982 A.2d 1218 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Mohamed v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor Vehicles

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the interlocutory order of the Commonwealth Court, dated May 4, 2009, is GRANTED. We assume plenary jurisdiction over Petitioner’s appeal as a sua sponte exercise of our extraordinary jurisdiction. 42 Pa.C.S. § 726; Vaccone v. Syken, 587 Pa. 380, 899 A.2d 1103, 1108 (2006). The issue on appeal, consolidated and rephrased for clarity, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Petitioner’s request for relief under 42 Pa.C.S. § 933(a) and transferring the matter to the court of common pleas?

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.