Withrow v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.
Withrow v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.
982 A.2d 511; 603 Pa. 682
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Withrow v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.
Opinion
JOSEPH M. WITHROW AND TAMMY J. WITHROW, HIS WIFE, Petitioners
v.
HOOSIER RACING TIRE CORP., MOTORDROME SPEEDWAY, INC., SMITHTON ENTERPRISES, INC., WHEEL SPECIALTIES, INC., CAROLE A. MILLER, D/B/A PRECISION CHASSIS & MACHINE, CARRY ALL PRODUCTS, INC., CARRY ALL PRODUCTS, CARRY ALL PRODUCTS, ETC., INC., SHAWN M. PHILLA, CAP RACING INC., CAP GLASS, INC., Respondents
PORT CITY RACING, INC., LANE AUTOMOTIVE, INC., A/K/A MOTOR STATE DISTRIBUTING, LEFTHANDER CHASSIS, INC., AND T. CLISE RACE CAR PARTS WAREHOUSE, Respondents
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of October 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.