Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 23, 2009 · Baer, Castille, Consideration, Eakin, Greenspan, McCaffery, Saylor, Todd
966 A.2d 568 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bloom

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 14, 2008, and following-oral argument, it is hereby

ORDERED that Arthur Louis Bloom be and he is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BAER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑