Commonwealth v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Cannon, 603 Pa. 137 (Pa. 2009)
982 A.2d 1218; 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2191

Commonwealth v. Cannon

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of October, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court override controlling authority establishing that in a joint trial, where the Commonwealth properly redacted a co-defendant’s statement and did not use it to directly establish defendant’s guilt, and where the trial court properly instructed the jury regarding that statement, the narrow exception to the presumption that a jury will follow its instructions established in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), does not apply?

Reference

Full Case Name
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Ernest CANNON
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published