David v. BOROUGH OF MOOSIC
David v. BOROUGH OF MOOSIC
989 A.2d 343
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
David v. BOROUGH OF MOOSIC
Opinion
David and Leslie GLEASON, Individually and as Parents of L.L.G., a minor, Laura L. Gleason and Derek W. Gleason, Petitioners
v.
BOROUGH OF MOOSIC, Pennsylvania, Michael J. Pasonick Jr. and Associates, and M.F. Ronca & Sons, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Should plaintiffs who attempt to invoke Pennsylvania's narrow discovery rule to toll the statute of limitations be required to prove their "reasonable diligence" in order to survive summary judgment, or should the determination of plaintiffs' "reasonable diligence" necessarily be submitted to the jury? See Wilson v. El-Daief, 600 Pa. 161, 964 A.2d 354 (2009).
Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.