*51 ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of May 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

In reversing the Common Pleas Court’s dismissal of this action for lack of jurisdiction by reason of the administrative remedy provided by the TICA at 40 P.S. § 910 — 44(b), did the Superior Court err by holding that the statutory and decisional rule that adequate administrative remedies are exclusive does not apply to consumer class actions?