White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, 994 A.2d 1083 (Pa. 2010)
606 Pa. 50; 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1092
Per Curiam
White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Opinion
*51 ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of May 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
In reversing the Common Pleas Court’s dismissal of this action for lack of jurisdiction by reason of the administrative remedy provided by the TICA at 40 P.S. § 910 — 44(b), did the Superior Court err by holding that the statutory and decisional rule that adequate administrative remedies are exclusive does not apply to consumer class actions?
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Nancy A. WHITE, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published