Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010

Branham v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY

Branham v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 4, 2010 · Per Curiam
995 A.2d 873; 606 Pa. 114; 2010 Pa. LEXIS 957 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Branham v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2010, “Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Application for Relief,” treated as a Petition for Relief per Pa.R.A.P. 123, is DENIED, and the Application to Expedite, the Motion to Supplement the Record, and the “Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion to Supplement the Record” are DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.