Commonwealth v. Morales
Commonwealth v. Morales
988 A.2d 1287; 605 Pa. 254; 2010 Pa. LEXIS 45
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Commonwealth v. Morales
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2010, the Petition for Leave to File Notice of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DISMISSED. As Petitioner’s filing is not a request for mandamus relief, this matter was improperly transferred from the Superior Court on that basis. To the extent that Petitioner seeks reinstatement mmc pro tunc of his right to appeal to the Superior Court from the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”) court’s order, the proper vehicle to make that request, if any, is a subsequent PCRA petition filed in the PCRA court. Cf. Kendrick v. District Attorney Of Philadelphia County, 591 Pa. 157, 916 A.2d 529, 537 (2007).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.