Commonwealth v. Garzone
Commonwealth v. Garzone
6 A.3d 500; 607 Pa. 325; 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2376
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
Commonwealth v. Garzone
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of October 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in removing the cost of employing county detectives and assistant district attorneys from the trial court’s discretion to impose prosecution expenses on a convicted offender?
This matter is to be consolidated with Commonwealth v. Gerald Garzone, — Pa. -, 6 A.3d 499 (2010).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.