Ingerman Affordable Housing, Inc. v. Edelstein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania December 7, 2011

Ingerman Affordable Housing, Inc. v. Edelstein, 33 A.3d 601 (Pa. 2011)

613 Pa. 315; 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2950

Per Curiam

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of December 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in finding that [petitioners] failed to establish sufficient facts of record to create a factual dispute to be determined by a jury that they were damaged by Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Margolis Edelstein?

(2) Did the Superior Court err in finding that [petitioners] failed to establish sufficient facts of record to create a *316 factual dispute to be determined by a jury that the harm suffered was caused by Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Margolis Edelstein?

Reference

Full Case Name: INGERMAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INC., the Ingerman Group, and Chatham Apartment Associates, L.P. by and Through Their Assignee, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Ingerman Construction Company, Inc. by and Through Its Assignee, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company in Its Own Right, Petitioners v. Margolis EDELSTEIN and Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Transamerican Insurance Group and the Insurance Corporation of New York, Respondent
Status: Published