Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011

Ingerman Affordable Housing, Inc. v. Edelstein

Ingerman Affordable Housing, Inc. v. Edelstein
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided December 7, 2011 · Per Curiam
33 A.3d 601; 613 Pa. 315; 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2950 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Ingerman Affordable Housing, Inc. v. Edelstein

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of December 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in finding that [petitioners] failed to establish sufficient facts of record to create a factual dispute to be determined by a jury that they were damaged by Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Margolis Edelstein?
(2) Did the Superior Court err in finding that [petitioners] failed to establish sufficient facts of record to create a *316 factual dispute to be determined by a jury that the harm suffered was caused by Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Margolis Edelstein?

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑