Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 23, 2011

Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc., 20 A.3d 1187 (Pa. 2011)

610 Pa. 410; 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1176

Per Curiam

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as phrased by petitioners, are:

*411 1. Did the Superior Court err in its determination that the assertion of highly reckless conduct is an affirmative defense contrary to prior decisions of this Court and of the Superior Court which classify such assertion as a denial of causation?

2. Did the Superior Court err in its determination to expand the requirements for proof of highly reckless conduct in contravention of prior decisions of that same [c]ourt?

Reference

Full Case Name: Duane REOTT and Patty Reott, Husband and Wife v. ASIA TREND, INC., Clam Corporation (As Successor-In-Interest to USL Outdoor Products, Inc.), USL Outdoor Products, Inc., Remington Arms Company, Inc., RA Brands, LLC and the Sportsman’s Guide. Petition of Asia Trend, Inc., Remington Arms Company, Inc., RA Brands, LLC and the Sportsman’s Guide
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published