Government Employees Insurance v. Ayers
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gallagher, B., Aplt. v. Geico Indemnity (Pa. 2019)
- Smith v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2019)
- Deborah Reichert v. State Farm Ins Co (3d Cir. 2012)
- Butta v. Geico Cas. Co. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2019)
- Stockdale v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2019)
- Gallagher, B. v. Geico Indemnity (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017)
- Sprague, R., Aplts v. Cortes, P. (Pa. 2016)
- Donovan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2019)
- Sprague, R., Aplts v. Cortes, P. (Pa. 2016)
- Petrosky v. Allstate Fire & Casualty Insurance (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2011, the Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
I would disapprove the utilization by an insurer of separate policies pertaining to multiple vehicles within the same household solely to subvert intra-policy stacking without any risk-based justification. Nevertheless, I am persuaded by the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, the rationale of the Superior Court, and the suggestion by a plurality of this Court that the writing of separate policies, and enforcement of the household exclusion, is justified relative to motorcycle insurance coverage. See Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Roth, 252 Fed.Appx. 505, 2007 WL 3226188, at *2-3 (3d Cir. 2007); Alderson v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 884 A.2d 288, 290 (Pa.Super. 2005); Erie Ins. Exch. v. Baker, 601 Pa. 355, 972 A.2d 507, 512 n. 9 (Pa. 2008) (plurality).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.