United Financial Casualty Co. v. Fornataro
United Financial Casualty Co. v. Fornataro
20 A.3d 481; 610 Pa. 393; 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1330
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
United Financial Casualty Co. v. Fornataro
Opinion
*394 ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, pursuant to Orsag v. Farmers New Century Insurance, 609 Pa. 388, 15 A.3d 896 (2011) (insureds express designation of UIM coverage in insurance application satisfied statutory requirement that insureds election of UIM coverage in amount lower than coverage amount for bodily injury be in writing), and the case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration in accordance with Orsag. Jurisdiction relinquished.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.