Alkhafaji v. TIAA-CREF
Alkhafaji v. TIAA-CREF
612 Pa. 311; 30 A.3d 1100; 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2433
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The Petition is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err when it reversed the decision of the lower court and held that a change of beneficiary by will was not, as a matter of law, permitted when the notice provision of TIAA-CREF annuity contracts did not clearly and unambiguously preclude a beneficiary designation by will?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.