Passarello v. Grumbine
Passarello v. Grumbine
44 A.3d 654; 615 Pa. 585; 2012 WL 1860990; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1201
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
Passarello v. Grumbine
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues are:
(1) Is it ever within the discretion of a trial judge to instruct the jury in a medical malpractice case that a doctor is not liable for a nonnegligent error of judgment?
(2) Was the Supreme Court’s retroactive application to the present case of the rule it announced in Pringle v. Rapaport[,] 980 A.2d 159 (Pa.Super. 2009) (en banc), contrary to the Supreme Court’s decision in Cleveland v. Johns-Manville Corp.[,] 547 Pa. 402, 690 A.2d 1146 (1997)?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.