Commonwealth v. Alicia
Commonwealth v. Alicia
44 A.3d 1147; 615 Pa. 613; 2012 WL 1676612; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1101
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Commonwealth v. Alicia (Pa. 2014)
- Commonwealth v. Harrell (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013)
- Commonwealth v. Koch (Pa. 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*614 ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Under this Court’s precedent, which the Superior Court mischaracterized and misapplied, does expert testimony on “the phenomenon of false confessions” impermissibly invade the jury’s exclusive role as the arbiter of credibility?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.