Gibbs v. Bayer Corporation

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Gibbs v. Bayer Corporation, 36 A.3d 589 (Pa. 2012)
614 Pa. 312; 2012 WL 284233; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 214
Per Curiam

Gibbs v. Bayer Corporation

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2012, as Petitioners’ Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction replaced the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction, the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. Additionally, the Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and the Motion for Leave to Supplement Application are GRANTED. Furthermore, the Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED. *313 Finally, the Motion for Consolidation is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Reference

Full Case Name
John GIBBS, II, as Husband of Brenda Lee Gibbs, Deceased, Respondent v. BAYER CORPORATION, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., F/K/A Berlex, Inc., F/K/A Berlex Laboratories, Inc. on Its Own Behalf and as Successor by Merger to Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and Bayer Pharma AG, F/K/A Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Petitioners
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published