Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012

Kaplan v. Bayer Corp.

Kaplan v. Bayer Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided February 1, 2012 · Per Curiam
36 A.3d 589; 614 Pa. 313; 2012 WL 284278; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 211 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Kaplan v. Bayer Corp.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2012, as Petitioners’ Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction replaced the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction, the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. Additionally, the Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and the Motion for Leave to Supplement Application are GRANTED. Furthermore, the Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED. *314 Finally, the Motion for Consolidation is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.