PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Notaro
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Notaro, 36 A.3d 1096 (Pa. 2012)
614 Pa. 318
Per Curiam
PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Notaro
Opinion
AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Does a Court act improperly by refusing to enforce a restrictive covenant contained in an employment agreement solely because the restrictive covenant was not expressly referenced in a non-binding initial offer letter, and the offer letter conditioned employment on the execution of the employment agreement?
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Petitioner v. Peter NOTARO and MK Precision LLC, Respondents
- Status
- Published