PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Notaro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Notaro, 36 A.3d 1096 (Pa. 2012)
614 Pa. 318
Per Curiam

PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Notaro

Opinion

AMENDED ORDER PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Does a Court act improperly by refusing to enforce a restrictive covenant contained in an employment agreement solely because the restrictive covenant was not expressly referenced in a non-binding initial offer letter, and the offer letter conditioned employment on the execution of the employment agreement?

Reference

Full Case Name
PULSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Petitioner v. Peter NOTARO and MK Precision LLC, Respondents
Status
Published