McClellan v. Bayer Corp.
McClellan v. Bayer Corp.
36 A.3d 590; 614 Pa. 314; 2012 WL 284309; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 215
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
McClellan v. Bayer Corp.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2012, as Petitioners’ Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction replaced the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction, the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. Additionally, the Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and the Motion for Leave to Supplement Application are GRANTED. Furthermore, the Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED. Finally, the Motion for Consolidation is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.