Money v. Bayer Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania February 1, 2012

Money v. Bayer Corp., 36 A.3d 590 (Pa. 2012)

614 Pa. 315; 2012 WL 284365; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 219

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2012, as Petitioners’ Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction replaced the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction, the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. Additionally, *591the Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and the Motion for Leave to Supplement Application are GRANTED. Furthermore, the Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED. Finally, the Motion for Consolidation is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Reference

Full Case Name: Stacie MONEY v. BAYER CORPORATION, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., f/k/a Berlex, Inc., f/k/a Berlex Laboratories, Inc. on its own Behalf and as Successor by Merger to Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and Bayer Pharma AG, f/k/a Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Status: Published