Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012

Commonwealth v. Steckley

Commonwealth v. Steckley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 4, 2012
41 A.3d 855; 615 Pa. 151; 2012 WL 1109434; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 732 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Commonwealth v. Steckley

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court’s imposition of a mandatory minimum given a failure to notify the Defendant/Appellant of the applicability of said mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9718.2(d)?
(2) Whether notice of the applicability of Section 9718.2 from defense counsel can satisfy Subsection 9718.2(d)’s notice requirement without violating attorney/client privilege and defense counsel’s duty to provide zealous representation?

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.