Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hummel, D. v. Walmart Stores, Inc, Aplt (Pa. 2014)
- Prieto Corp. v. Gambone Construction Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)
- Scungio Borst v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014)
- Braun, M. v. Walmart Stores, Inc., Aplt (Pa. 2014)
- Polett v. Public Communications, Inc. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of JULY, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue is:
Whether, in a purported class action tried to verdict, it violates Pennsylvania law (including the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure) to subject Wal-Mart to a “Trial by Formula” that relieves Plaintiffs of their burden to produce class-wide “common” evidence on key elements of their claims.
Further, Petitioners’ Applications for Leave to File Post-Alloeatur Communications and a Reply are DENIED as moot.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.