Commonwealth v. Raban
Commonwealth v. Raban
52 A.3d 222; 616 Pa. 590; 2012 WL 3818989; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2072
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Commonwealth v. Raban (Pa. 2014)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Superior Court correctly held that Section 305(a)(1) of the Dog Law, 3 P.S. § 459-305(a)(l), is a strict liability offense. In briefing this issue, the parties are directed to include a discussion within the framework of the Statutory Construction Act, 1 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 1501 et seq., as to whether the General Assembly intended Section 305(a)(1) to be a strict liability offense.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.