Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department, 55 A.3d 1043 (Pa. 2012)
618 Pa. 148; 2012 WL 4739525; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2306

Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2012, the “Application by Way of Petition for King’s- Bench Relief and Supersedeas,” *1044Application for Appointment of Counsel, and the Request for an Immediate Injunction” are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record.

Reference

Full Case Name
In re Nelson SOTO (JB-5438) v. PHILADELPHIA ADULT PROBATION & PAROLE DEPARTMENT Linda Kelly, PA Attorney General Danial [sic] Burns, Superintendent SCI Pittsburgh, Pa. Dep't of Corrections Anne B. Taylor, Assistant City Solicitor's Office
Status
Published
↑