Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012

Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department

Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 4, 2012
55 A.3d 1043; 618 Pa. 148; 2012 WL 4739525; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 2306 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Soto v. Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2012, the “Application by Way of Petition for King’s- Bench Relief and Supersedeas,” *1044Application for Appointment of Counsel, and the Request for an Immediate Injunction” are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑