Wayne M. Chiurazzi Law, Inc. v. MRO Corp.
Wayne M. Chiurazzi Law, Inc. v. MRO Corp.
614 Pa. 572; 39 A.3d 267; 2012 WL 556225; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 375
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Wayne M. Chiurazzi Law Inc. v. MRO Corp. (Pa. 2014)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
AND NOW, this 22nd day of February 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:
(1) Does the Medical Records Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6152(a)(1) and (a)(2)(i), require medical records reproducers to disclose their estimated actual and reasonable expenses of reproducing the charts or records, and to limit their copying charges to these amounts or the statutory ceiling rates, whichever is less?
(2) If so, where a medical records reproducer failed to disclose and charge its estimated actual and reasonable expenses and instead charges the MRA’s ceiling rates, do the “voluntary payment” and “prior approval” defenses bar the records requestor from bringing a subsequent breach of contract claim to recoup the unlawful over-payment?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.