Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013

Commonwealth v. Jaroma

Commonwealth v. Jaroma
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 7, 2013
77 A.3d 633; 621 Pa. 335; 2013 WL 5524463; 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2270 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

Commonwealth v. Jaroma

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration of Commonwealth v. Brock, — Pa. -, 61 A.3d 1015 (2013) (holding that a motion to dismiss made pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600 must be made in writing, and a copy of such motion must be served on the Commonwealth’s attorney).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.