Coleman v. Morris
Coleman v. Morris
620 Pa. 446; 68 A.3d 328; 2013 WL 2662660; 2013 Pa. LEXIS 1236
Coleman v. Morris
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of June 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Does the limitation on damages in a legal malpractice action sounding only in contract set forth in Bailey v. Tucker, 533 Pa. 237, 252, 621 A.2d 108, 115 (1993) — which limited such damages to “the amount actually paid for the services plus statutory interest” in a case involving an underlying criminal representation — apply where the underlying representation is a civil one?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.