Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014

In re Nomination Petition of Marburger

In re Nomination Petition of Marburger
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 2, 2014 · Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Saylor, Stevens, Todd
91 A.3d 1230; 625 Pa. 339; 2014 WL 1771566; 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1141 (Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)

In re Nomination Petition of Marburger

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2014, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby REVERSED. See In re Nomination Petition of Guzzardi — Pa. -, 91 A.3d 701, 2014 WL 1758139 (2014) (per curiam order with opinions to follow) (stating that nunc pro tunc principles cannot apply to cure a fatal defect under Section 1104(b)(3) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1104(b)(3)).

It is further ORDERED that Gordon Marburger’s name is to be STRICKEN from the primary ballot for the Republican Party nomination for the Office of Representative in the General Assembly from the 12th District.

Justice BAER files-a concurring statement in which Madame Justice TODD joins.

Concurring Opinion

Justice BAER,

concurring.

I concur in the reversal of the Commonwealth Court’s order, but distance myself from the Court’s reliance upon In re Nomination Petition of Guzzardi, — Pa. -, 91 A.3d 701, 2014 WL 1758139 (2014) (per curiam order with opinion to follow), for the proposition that nunc pro tunc principles cannot apply to cure a fatal defect under Section 1104(b)(3) of the Ethics Act, 65 Pa.C.S. § 1104(b)(3). While I believe that nunc pro tunc principles may apply to cure a fatal defect in a nomination petition, see Guzzardi, supra, (Baer, J., dissenting), the candidate herein did not satisfy the requisites for such relief.

Justice TODD joins.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.