Gilbert v. Synagro Central, LLC
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Gilbert v. Synagro Central, LLC, 628 Pa. 4 (Pa. 2014)
101 A.3d 1149; 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2708
Gilbert v. Synagro Central, LLC
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is:
Did the Superior Court incorrectly interpret the Pennsylvania [RTFA] by requiring a jury trial to determine that the land application of biosolids falls within the Act’s definition of a “normal agricultural operation,” which was contrary to the Act and this Court’s precedent that statutes of repose and statutory interpretation present questions of law for resolution by courts, not juries?
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ralph GILBERT, Gloria Gilbert, Michelle Torgerson, Edwin Torgerson, Melda Bittorf, Beverly Cox, William Cox, Kimberly Miles, Clea Fockler, John Fockler, Linda Eckert, Scott Eckert, William Strine, Kenny Jasinski, Dennis Jasinski, Kathryn Jasinski, Joseph Jasinski, Patricia Unverzagt, Megan Jacobs, Barbara Unverzagt, Donna Parr, Jeff Fodel, Wendy Fodel, Jennifer Jasinski, John Jasinski, Judy Queitzsch, Jean Fry, Rick McSherry, John Freese, Donna Lynn Freese, Jeff Van Voorhis, Susan Lee Fox, Terrence Fancher and Donna Fancher v. SYNAGRO CENTRAL, LLC, Synagro Mid-Atlantic, George Phillips, Hilltop Farms and Steve Troyer
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published