Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015

In re: 27th Phila. County Inves. Grand Jury

In re: 27th Phila. County Inves. Grand Jury
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 14, 2015 · Per Curiam
In re: 27th Phila. County Inves. Grand Jury

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: THE TWENTY-SEVENTH : No. 171 EM 2014

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY :

INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY : : :

PETITION OF: OFFICE OF ATTORNEY :

GENERAL :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2015, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED. Per Supervising Judge Diana L. Anhalt’s in camera answer, the protective order issued out of concern over retaliation and intimidation against employees of Office of Attorney General as a result of their grand jury testimony. The order is intended to prohibit only obstruction, intimidation, or retaliation against any witnesses subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury; it is not intended to limit the law enforcement or prosecutorial authority of the Office of Attorney General.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.