Millingshausen, S. v. Drake, K., Capka, J.,et al
Millingshausen, S. v. Drake, K., Capka, J.,et al
108 A.3d 1278; 631 Pa. 203; 2015 Pa. LEXIS 176
(Atlantic Reporter, Third Series)
Millingshausen, S. v. Drake, K., Capka, J.,et al
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issues are:
(1) Did [the] Superior Court err when it failed to review the trial court’s denial of a motion to compel arbitration for an abuse of discretion or error of law and to determine whether the trial court’s findings were supported by substantial evidence, and applied its own judgment to reverse the decision?
(2) Was it error for [the] Superior Court to recast [petitioner]^ complaint for defamation as a claim for breach of contract contrary to this Court’s holdings in Steiner v. Markel, 600 Pa. 515, 522, 968 A.2d 1253, 1257 (2009)[J *204 and Bricklayers of W. Pa. Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott’s Development Co., [625 Pa. 26, 90 A.3d 682 (2014) ]?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.