Johnson v. Lansdale Boro
Johnson v. Lansdale Boro
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
GEORGE JOHNSON, : No. 930 MAL 2014 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Commonwealth Court v. : : : LANSDALE BOROUGH AND LANSDALE : BOROUGH CIVIL SERVICE : COMMISSION, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issues, as stated by Petitioner: a. Whether the Commonwealth Court committed reversible error by holding that a common pleas court’s standard of review of a civil service commission adjudication is de novo, where a common pleas court takes no additional evidence on appeal and limits itself to the record before the commission?
b. Whether the Commonwealth Court committed reversible error by holding that a common pleas court may modify a penalty imposed by a municipality, where there is no evidence whatsoever that the penalty was arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory?
In all other respects, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.