Mason, K. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. County
Mason, K. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. County
Mason, K. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. County
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
KASHYISM MANSON, : No. 6 EM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JUDGE SUSAN I. SCHULMAN, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that a pro se filing presented by an appellant represented by counsel is a “legal nullity”).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.